Jail inmate accused of rape dies after hanging
July 4, 2016
Holly Breaux
July 4, 2016
The elections process is not usually grist for inflammatory rhetoric. But this year has been different. For many voters, the intricacies of voting rules quickly became a topic of overriding interest.
We’ve seen two diverging trends in the states in recent years. One approach has sought to make voting more difficult, with a variety of laws requiring IDs and limiting the ways in which people can vote. The other has sought to make the process of voting simple and convenient.
On the whole, Republicans at the state level have favored greater restrictiveness and Democrats greater ease, but you don’t have to be a partisan of one side or the other to recognize that politicians believe a great deal is at stake. Which is why the question of how to approach the right to vote isn’t going to be settled any time soon.
If we’re going to debate the electoral process as a nation, let’s keep in mind the core issue: it should be easy to vote — and hard to cheat. Every American should be able to exercise his or her right to vote without feeling cowed — which is why I worry that efforts to limit voting will have a pernicious effect on our system of representative government.
One certainty in all this is that our entire voting system needs attention. All too many jurisdictions try to run elections on the cheap, with machinery and processes that are inadequate to the task. Even now, 16 years after the 2000 presidential election revealed deep flaws in the patchwork of ways we record and tally votes, the system remains rickety.
“The vigor of American democracy rests on the vote of each citizen,” a national commission on voting once wrote. Keep that in mind this election year — and pay attention to how your state approaches its obligation to safeguard that vigor.
